Peaceless Europe by Francesco Saverio Nitti
page 28 of 286 (09%)
page 28 of 286 (09%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Clemenceau bluntly declared to the French Chamber that treaties were a
means of continuing the War. He was perfectly right, for war is being waged more bitterly than ever and peace is as remote as it ever was. The problem with which modern statesmen are confronted is very simple: can Europe continue in her decline without involving the ruin of civilization? And is it possible to stop this process of decay without finding some form of civil symbiosis which will ensure for all men a more human mode of living? In the affirmative case what course should we take, and is it presumable that there should be an immediate change for the better in the situation, given the national and economic interests now openly and bitterly in conflict? We have before us a problem, or rather a series of problems, which call for impartiality and calm if a satisfactory solution is to be arrived at. Perhaps if some fundamental truths were brought home to the people, or, to be more exact, to the peoples now at loggerheads with each other, a notion of the peril equally impending upon all concerned and the conviction that an indefinite prolongation of the present state of things is impossible, would prove decisive factors in restoring a spirit of peace and in reviving that spirit of solidarity which now appears spent or slumbering. But in the first place it is necessary to review the situation, such as it is at the present moment: Firstly, Europe, which was the creditor of all other continents, has now become their debtor. Secondly, her working capacity has greatly decreased, chiefly owing to |
|