American Political Ideas Viewed from the Standpoint of Universal History by John Fiske
page 39 of 110 (35%)
page 39 of 110 (35%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
_brotherhood_, in Rome as the _curia_. Yet alongside of the Roman group
called the _curia_ there is a group whose name, the _century_, exactly translates the name of the Teutonic group; and, as Mr. Freeman says, it is difficult to believe that the Roman _century_ did not at the outset in some way correspond to the Teutonic _hundred_ as a stage in political organization. But both these terms, as we know them in history, are survivals from some prehistoric state of things; and whether they were originally applied to a hundred of houses, or of families, or of warriors, we do not know.[8] M. Geffroy, in his interesting essay on the Germania of Tacitus, suggests that the term _canton_ may have a similar origin.[9] The outlines of these primitive groups are, however, more obscure than those of the more primitive mark, because in most cases they have been either crossed and effaced or at any rate diminished in importance by the more highly compounded groups which came next in order of formation. Next above the _hundred_, in order of composition, comes the group known in ancient Italy as the_pagus_, in Attika perhaps as the _deme_, in Germany and at first in England as the _gau_ or _ga_, at a later date in England as the _shire_. Whatever its name, this group answers to the _tribe_ regarded as settled upon a certain determinate territory. Just as in the earlier nomadic life the aggregation of clans makes ultimately the tribe, so in the more advanced agricultural life of our Aryan ancestors the aggregation of marks or village-communities makes ultimately the _gau_ or _shire_. Properly speaking, the name _shire_ is descriptive of division and not of aggregation; but this term came into use in England after the historic order of formation had been forgotten, and when the _shire_ was looked upon as a _piece_ of some larger whole, such as the kingdom of Mercia or Wessex. Historically, however, the _shire_ was not made, like the _departments_ of modern France, by the division of the kingdom for administrative purposes, but the kingdom was made by the union of shires that were previously |
|