The Great English Short-Story Writers, Volume 1 by Unknown
page 18 of 298 (06%)
page 18 of 298 (06%)
|
[Footnote 9: In his introduction to _Materials and Methods of
Fiction_, by Clayton Hamilton, published by the Baker & Taylor Co., New York.] He argues from this that "prose seemed to the Greeks, and even to the Latins who followed in their footsteps, as fit only for pedestrian purposes." It is more probable that, as regards prose-fiction, they did not realize that they were called upon to explain the omission of the tenth muse. Her exclusion was based on no reasoned principle, but was due to a sensuous art-instinct: the Greeks felt that the unnatural limitations of the poetic medium were more in keeping with the unnatural[10] brevity of a story which must be short. The exquisite prose tales which have been handed down to us belong to the age of their decadence as a nation; in their great period their tellers of brief tales unconsciously cast their rendering in the poetic mould.[11] In natures of the highest genius the most arduous is instinctively the favorite task. [Footnote 10: "The short-story is artificial, and to a considerable degree unnatural. It could hardly be otherwise, for it takes out of our complex lives a single person or a single incident and treats that as if it were complete in itself. Such isolation is not known to nature."--Page 22 of _Short-Story Writing_, by Charles Raymond Barrett, published by the Baker & Taylor Co., New York.] [Footnote 11: For example, the story told by Demodocus of _The Illicit Love of Ares for Aphrodite, and the Revenge which Hephaestus Planned_--Odyssey, Bk. VIII.] Chaucer, by reason of his intimate acquaintance with both the poetry |
|