Rhetoric and Poetry in the Renaissance - A Study of Rhetorical Terms in English Renaissance Literary Criticism by Donald Lemen Clark
page 25 of 193 (12%)
page 25 of 193 (12%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
good pedagogy, for advice as to how to improve sentences or verses is
appropriate only after the sentences have been planned and written. Besides urging the young poet to revise and correct his manuscript carefully, to put it aside nine years, and to seek the criticism of a sincere friend, Horace considers the value of the finished product. A poem will please more people if it combines the pleasant with the profitable. If a poem is not really good, it is bad. If the young poet finds that his work is not of high excellence, he would do better not to publish it. A poem is like a picture, Horace says, in that some poems appear to better advantage close up, and others at a distance. It is noteworthy that in his "_ut pictura poesis_" Horace is not pressing the analogy between the arts as did subsequent critics who quoted his phrase incompletely. Of the four classical discussions of the theory of poetry which are here treated, that of Horace was best known throughout the middle ages and the early renaissance. Just what the influence of the _Ars poetica_ was and why it was so great a favorite will be discussed in subsequent chapters. Chapter III Classical Rhetoric 1. Definitions |
|