Rhetoric and Poetry in the Renaissance - A Study of Rhetorical Terms in English Renaissance Literary Criticism by Donald Lemen Clark
page 63 of 193 (32%)
page 63 of 193 (32%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
one of the parts of a speech. But the _Ad Herennium_ does make _divisio_ a
part of a speech,[160] and does require not over three parts.[161] As late as 1612, Thomas Heywood quotes the authority of "Tully, in his booke _Ad Caium Herennium_."[162] The relative importance of Cicero's rhetorical works to the middle ages is well illustrated by a count of the manuscripts preserved. In the libraries of Europe today there exist seventy-nine manuscripts of the _De inventione_, eighty-three of the _Ad Herennium_, forty of the _De oratore_, fourteen of the _Brutus_, and twenty of the _Orator._[163] Thus in the University of Bologna the study of rhetoric was based on the _De inventione_ and the _Ad Herennium_.[164] The _De inventione_ is the source for Alcuin's rhetorical writings, and was the only Ciceronian rhetoric known to Abelard or Dante. Brunette Latini translated seventeen chapters of it into Italian.[165] Although mutilated codices of the _De oratore_ and the _Orator_ were known to Servatus Lupus and John of Salisbury, complete manuscripts of these most important works were not known previous to 1422.[166] The _Ad Herennium_ and the _De inventione_ were first printed by Jenson at Venice in 1470. The first book printed at Angers (1476) was the _Ad Herennium_ under the usual mediaeval title of the _Rhetorica nova_. The first edition of the _De oratore_ was printed in the monastery of Subaco about 1466. The _Brutus_ first appeared in Rome (1469) in the same year which witnessed the first edition of the Orator.[167] Before its first printing the _Orator_ was used as a reference book for advanced students by Guarino in his school at Ferrara. Castiglione's indebtedness to the _De oratore_ is well known, but few notice that his first paragraphs are a close paraphrase of Cicero's dedicatory paragraphs of the _Orator._ |
|