Turkey: a Past and a Future by Arnold Joseph Toynbee
page 30 of 78 (38%)
page 30 of 78 (38%)
|
"There is no power in Persia to put down such a movement, because it could do no harm to anyone. The nationalisation of the Persian Turks would even be a great and unexpected help to the Persian Government.... Persia would be situated with regard to the Turkish Government as Bavaria towards Prussia." And this is only a stage towards a higher goal: "The united Turks should form the centre of gravity of the world of Islam. The Arabs of Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia, the Persians, Afghans, etc., must enjoy complete independence in their own affairs, but outwardly the world of Islam must present a perfectly united front." The Arabs of North Africa and the Shias of Iran can appraise the "independence" held out to them by the "unity" which Turkish Nationalism has been presenting already to Syria and Irak, the Yemen and the Hedjaz. But Tekin Alp deals even less tenderly with Russia. In explaining the bond of interest between Turkish Nationalism and Germany he remarks that "The Pan-Turkish aspirations cannot come to their full development and realisation until the Muscovite monster is crushed, because the very districts which are the object of Turkish Irredentism--Siberia, the Caucasus, the Crimea, Afghanistan, etc.--are still directly or indirectly under Russian rule." The "et cetera" proves to be nothing less than the province of Kazan: "The alluvial plains of the Volga and the Kama, in European Russia, are |
|