The Great Events by Famous Historians, Volume 05 - (From Charlemagne to Frederick Barbarossa) by Unknown
page 28 of 503 (05%)
page 28 of 503 (05%)
|
beneficium is partly of Roman, partly of German origin; in the Roman
system the usufruct--the occupation of land belonging to another person--involved no diminution of status; in the Germanic system he who tilled land that was not his own was imperfectly free; the reduction of a large Roman population to dependence placed the two classes on a level, and conduced to the wide extension of the institution. Commendation, on the other hand, may have had a Gallic or Celtic origin, and an analogy only with the Roman clientship. The German _comitatus_, which seems to have ultimately merged its existence in one or other of these developments, is of course to be carefully distinguished in its origin from them. The tie of the benefice or of commendation could be formed between any two persons whatever; none but the king could have _antrustions_. But the comitatus of Anglo-Saxon history preserved a more distinct existence, and this perhaps was one of the causes that distinguished the later Anglo-Saxon system most definitely from the feudalism of the Frank empire. The process by which the machinery of government became feudalized, although rapid, was gradual. The weakness of the Carlovingian kings and emperors gave room for the speedy development of disruptive tendencies in a territory so extensive and so little consolidated. The duchies and counties of the eighth and ninth centuries were still official magistracies, the holders of which discharged the functions of imperial judges or generals. Such officers were of course men whom the kings could trust, in most cases Franks, courtiers or kinsmen, who at an earlier date would have been _comites_ or antrustions, and who were provided for by feudal benefices. The official magistracy had in itself the tendency to become hereditary, and |
|