American Big Game in Its Haunts by Various
page 64 of 367 (17%)
page 64 of 367 (17%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
to hoofed beasts, but outlasting them into the succeeding age. These two
groups of generalized mammals approached each other so nearly in structure, that it is even doubtful to which of them certain outlying fossils should be referred, and the assumption is quite justified that they had a common ancestor in the preceding period, of which no record is yet known. The most evident points in which _Carnivora_ differ from _Ungulata_ are their possession of at least four and frequently five digits, which always bear claws and never hoofs; all but the sea otter have six small incisor teeth in each jaw; the canines are large; the molars never show flattened, curved crests after the ruminant pattern, but are more or less tubercular, and one tooth in the hinder part of each jaw becomes blade-like, for shearing off lumps of flesh. This tooth is called the sectorial, or carnassial. Existing carnivores are conveniently divided into three sections: _Arctoidea_--bears, raccoons, otters, skunks, weasels, etc.; _Canoidea_--dogs, wolves and foxes; _Aeluroidea_--cats, civets, ichneumons and hyaenas. It is highly probable that these three chief types have descended in as many distinct lines from the _Creodonta_, and that they were differentiated as early as the middle Eocene, but their exact degree of affinity is uncertain; bears and dogs are certainly closer together than either of them are to cats, and it is questionable if otters and weasels--the _Mustelidae_, as they are termed--and raccoons are really near of kin to bears. Seals are often regarded as belonging to this order, but their relation |
|