A Political Diary 1828-1830, Volume II by Edward (Lord Ellenborough) Law
page 48 of 438 (10%)
page 48 of 438 (10%)
|
We had some talk about the Anatomy Bill. The Duke is afraid of passing it. Indeed, it is not a Government measure. Probably it will be withdrawn for the year. The Bishops are very hostile to it. _June 4._ London Bridge Committee from eleven till four. We made great progress in our evidence, and, indeed, nearly proved our case. From four to five we had a very painful discussion in consequence of some words which passed between Lord Durham and Lord Beresford. We succeeded at last in settling the difference. Lord Beresford, having no good word at his disposal, said he did not second the _evil deeds_ or _improprieties_ of noble lords. He really meant _irregularities_, and irregularities only as a member of the Committee. Lord Grey was present and much distressed. The Duke of Wellington's authority induced both to become amenable to the wish of the Committee. _June 5._ Anatomy Bill. Some talk; but a general agreement suggested by the Archbishop of Canterbury, that the Bill should be read a second time, and not proceeded with this session. The Duke of Wellington expressed his general approbation of the principle, but thought postponement desirable. He pledged himself to _cooperate_ in bringing in a Bill on the same principle, and having the same objects, next year; but did not pledge himself to bring it in himself. |
|