Why We Are at War (2nd Edition, revised) by Members of the Oxford Faculty of Modern History
page 17 of 302 (05%)
page 17 of 302 (05%)
|
entered into an identic treaty with Great Britain (Aug. 1870) to the
effect that, if either belligerent violated Belgian territory, Great Britain would co-operate with the other for the defence of it. The treaty was most strictly construed. After the battle of Sedan (Sept. 1870) the German Government applied to Belgium for leave to transport the German wounded across Belgian territory. France protested that this would be a breach of neutrality and Belgium refused. Such is the history of the process by which Belgium has acquired her special status. As an independent state she is bound by the elementary principle of the law of nations, that a neutral state is bound to refuse to grant a right of passage to a belligerent. This is a well-established rule, and was formally affirmed by the Great Powers at the Hague Peace Conference of 1907. The fifth Article of the Convention [3] then drawn up respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in War on Land runs as follows:-- 'A neutral power ought not to allow on its territory any of the acts referred to in Articles 2 to 4'. Of the Articles thus specified the most important is No. 2:-- 'Belligerents are forbidden to move across the territory of a neutral power troops or convoys, either of munitions of war or supplies'. By the Treaty of London the existence of Belgium is contingent upon her perpetual neutrality:-- 'ARTICLE VII. Belgium within the limits specified in |
|