The Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; Religion, a Dialogue, Etc. by Arthur Schopenhauer
page 25 of 93 (26%)
page 25 of 93 (26%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
whose education and capacities it was most suited. So there is always an
inferior metaphysical system of the schools for the educated multitude, and a higher one for the _élite_. Kant's lofty doctrine, for instance, had to be degraded to the level of the schools and ruined by such men as Fries, Krug and Salat. In short, here, if anywhere, Goethe's maxim is true, _One does not suit all_. Pure faith in revelation and pure metaphysics are for the two extremes, and for the intermediate steps mutual modifications of both in innumerable combinations and gradations. And this is rendered necessary by the immeasurable differences which nature and education have placed between man and man. _Philalethes_. The view you take reminds me seriously of the mysteries of the ancients, which you mentioned just now. Their fundamental purpose seems to have been to remedy the evil arising from the differences of intellectual capacity and education. The plan was, out of the great multitude utterly impervious to unveiled truth, to select certain persons who might have it revealed to them up to a given point; out of these, again, to choose others to whom more would be revealed, as being able to grasp more; and so on up to the Epopts. These grades correspond to the little, greater and greatest mysteries. The arrangement was founded on a correct estimate of the intellectual inequality of mankind. _Demopheles_. To some extent the education in our lower, middle and high schools corresponds to the varying grades of initiation into the mysteries. _Philalethes_. In a very approximate way; and then only in so far as subjects of higher knowledge are written about exclusively in Latin. But since that has ceased to be the case, all the mysteries are profaned. |
|