Three Frenchmen in Bengal - The Commercial Ruin of the French Settlements in 1757 by S. C. (Samuel Charles) Hill
page 40 of 198 (20%)
page 40 of 198 (20%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
other answer than that in a very few days, or hours perhaps,
he would give them a very good opportunity of testifying their zeal for the Company and the Grand Monarque." The offer of ransom was made, and was refused by the Admiral. Renault says, he-- "insisted on our surrendering and the troops taking possession of the Fort, _promising, however, that every one should keep his own property_. There was not a man amongst us who did not prefer to run the risk of whatever might happen to surrendering in this fashion, without the Fort having yet suffered any material damage, and every one was willing to risk his own interests in order to defend those of the Company. Every one swore to do his best." The Admiral could not attack at once, owing to the state of the river, but to secure his own position against any counter-attack, such as was very likely with a man like Captain de la Vigne in the Fort, he sent up boats the same night, and sank the vessels which it was supposed the French intended to use as fire-ships; and the next day Mr. John Delamotte, master of the _Kent_, under a heavy fire, sounded and buoyed the passage for the ships. The army, meanwhile, continued its monotonous work ashore, the soldiers building batteries for the French to knock to pieces, but succeeding in Clive's object, which was "to keep the enemy constantly awake."[47] Sometimes this work was dangerous, as, for instance, on the 21st, when a ball from the Fort knocked down a verandah close to one of the English batteries, "the rubbish of |
|