Three Frenchmen in Bengal - The Commercial Ruin of the French Settlements in 1757 by S. C. (Samuel Charles) Hill
page 49 of 198 (24%)
page 49 of 198 (24%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
property.
7. All inhabitants to retain their property. _Answer_. This to be left to the Admiral's sense of equity. 8. The French Factories up-country to be left in the hands of their present chiefs. _Answer_. This to be settled by the Nawab and the Admiral. 9. The French Company's servants to go where they please, with their clothes and linen. _Answer_. Agreed to. It is evident that the capitulation was badly drawn up. Civilians who had taken part in the defence, as had all the Company's servants, might be justly included in the garrison, and accordingly Admiral Watson and Clive declared they were all prisoners of war, and that article 9 merely permitted them to reside where they pleased on _parole_. On the other hand, Renault and the French Council declared that, being civilians, nothing could make them part of the garrison, and therefore under article 9 they might do what they pleased. Accordingly, they expressed much surprise when they were stopped at the Fort gates by one of Clive's officers, and forced to sign, before they were allowed to pass, a paper promising not to act against Britain directly or indirectly during the course of the war. Another point of difficulty was in reference to article 7. The town had been in the hands of the British soldiers and sepoys for days. Much had been plundered, and both soldiers and sailors were wild for loot. They considered that the Admiral was acting unjustly to them |
|