What Dress Makes of Us by Dorothy Quigley
page 53 of 56 (94%)
page 53 of 56 (94%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
If he wears black and white check trousers and a short blue coat, he
should travel with a screen. A man in just such a rig attracted no end of comment in a fashionable hotel. The caricaturing effect of his trousers and coat were unspeakably comical. The wearer had a face as grave as an undertaker's and the air of a serious-minded college professor; but he had the nondescript look of a scarecrow composed of whatever available garments could be obtained from the cast-off wardrobe of summer boarders in a farmhouse. [Illustration: NO. 90] Coats assuredly have the power of making cartoons--living, jocular cartoons--of their wearers. It would hardly seem necessary to call attention to the fact that a man of huge dimensions should not wear a short coat, such as shown in sketch No. 91, yet his type is too frequently seen attired in this style. A man so dressed certainly seems the living exemplification of the definition of a jug, namely, "a vessel usually with a swelling belly, narrow mouth, and a handle, for holding liquors." It cannot be reiterated too often that a large, stout man should aim to acquire the distinction and dignity given by long lines. If his body is proportioned so he really has neither length of torso nor of limb he must pay more attention to the cut of his clothes and attain length in whatever artistic way he can. The long coat, as may be seen in sketch No. 92, not only apparently adds length but it conceals too protuberant curves. [Illustration: NOS. 91 and 92] Of course, character counts far more than clothes, we will all agree to that, but at first glance it is a man's clothes that impress people. |
|