Essays in Rebellion by Henry W. Nevinson
page 23 of 336 (06%)
page 23 of 336 (06%)
|
Latin Civitas. This is the generation of that great Leviathan,
that mortal God, to whom we owe, under the immortal God, our peace and defence." Hobbes considered the object of this Covenant to be peace and common defence. "Without a State," he said, "the life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." The preservation of the State was to him of transcendent importance. "Loss of liberty," he wrote, "is really no inconvenience, for it is the only means by which we have any possibility of preserving ourselves. For if every man were allowed the liberty of following his own conscience, in such differences of consciences, they would not live together in peace an hour." Under such a system, it follows that rebellion is the worst of crimes. Hobbes calls it a war renewed--a renouncing of the Covenant. He was so terrified of it that he dwelt upon the danger of reading Greek and Roman history (probably having Plutarch and his praise of rebels most in mind)--"which venom," he says, "I will not doubt to compare to the biting of a mad dog." In all leaders of rebellion he found only three conditions--to be discontented with their own lot, to be eloquent speakers, and to be men of mean judgment and capacity _(De Corpore Politico_, II.). And as to punishment: "On rebels," he said, "vengeance is lawfully extended, not only to the fathers, but also to the third and fourth generations not yet in being, and consequently innocent of the fact for which they are afflicted." |
|