Industrial Progress and Human Economics by James Hartness
page 48 of 93 (51%)
page 48 of 93 (51%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
that it is only necessary for him to think of just one little part
of the whole. And we should not befog the issue by saying that this is degrading. Some of the greatest scientists that the world has known have concentrated attention to the smallest conceivable part of this world, pieces so small that the microscope alone revealed them to the eye. There is a chance for the thinker in most any of these places that have grown out of this process of finest subdivision of work. The hardship comes only when the mind cannot get interested in the work. In many cases this is undoubtedly due to a misfit, but in most cases it seems to be due to a false notion that there is nothing there of interest. The subdivision of work must go on. If hindered in any one plant, industry or nation more than in others, the result will be a loss to that one, and on the other hand, the one that carries it to the most efficient point will become the most powerful. This subdivision develops greatest dexterity and skill, as well as the keenest comprehension of the ways and means of attaining a given end. And this dexterity of operation is more easily carried on than is the fumbling uncertainty of the work of the more primitive type. Care in Applying New Theories. The manual worker's energies are so absorbed in the physical tasks |
|