Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, March 5, 1919 by Various
page 32 of 63 (50%)
page 32 of 63 (50%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
On the resumption of the proceedings it was explained that since the passing of the Two Hours Maximum Day Bill the supply of labour had been inadequate to meet the demands made upon it, and plaintiff had patriotically filled four posts, at the minimum rate of fifteen shillings an hour. It was while he was hurrying from one sphere of activity to another that the collision occurred, resulting in injury to the plaintiff's mud-guard and loss of valuable time. Defendant, who admitted negligence, pleaded poverty and threw himself upon the mercy of the Court. The Bench, in summing up, called the jury's attention to the fact that defendant was not a labourer, but only a professional man; at the same time he reminded them of the impartiality of British justice, which did not admit that there was one law for the rich and another for the poor. Even the wealthiest labouring-man must be protected in the exercise of his inalienable right to work. The accompanying photograph shows the plaintiff in the act of assisting to build a wall.; He is a self-made man, having started life as a solicitor and by sheer perseverance raised himself to the lucrative and responsible' position of an unskilled bricklayer's labourer. * * * * * TO M. GEORGES CLEMENCEAU. Strong son of France, whose words were ever lit |
|