The Mirror of Literature, Amusement, and Instruction - Volume 13, No. 363, March 28, 1829 by Various
page 15 of 54 (27%)
page 15 of 54 (27%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
At the famous battle of Crescy, gained by Edward III., notwithstanding a vast carnage of the French, and an infinite number of prisoners, the English lost only one 'squire, three knights, and a few of inferior rank.--_History of England, by Goldsmith._ At the battle of Agincourt, gained by Henry V. the French lost ten thousand men, and fourteen thousand prisoners; the English (although enfeebled by disease, destitute of provisions, and harassed by fatigue) lost only forty men in all--Ibid.--Hear these facts of ancient prowess, ye heroes of modern times; who among ye ever gained such signal advantages with losses so insignificant?--In good truth, I must admit, that even I was once inclined to cry out with Mr. Burchell, "fudge;" but the following morceaux have explained to me the (otherwise) mysterious relation:-- _One_ Englishman can beat _five_ Frenchmen.--_Williamson's Serious Propositions_, page 78.--One English man-of-war, will beat a Dutch fleet--_Nebolt's Naval Expeditions_, chap. iv. section 9.--Indeed! what a scandalous shame it is then to call Admiral Blake a naval hero; surely he could have been but a mere botch to make such a tough job of cutting up Van Tromp, the Dutch commander. * * * * * Though I have examined what all other authors have written on this affair with great impartiality, yet I cannot conceive that any of them have the least merit; nor do I find one man that has treated this subject sensibly, besides myself.--_Smithson's Amiableness of Candour and Diffidence_, page |
|