The Pirates of Malabar, and an Englishwoman in India Two Hundred Years Ago by John Biddulph
page 36 of 246 (14%)
page 36 of 246 (14%)
|
they were intended for piracy in the Eastern seas. Whatever compunction
might be felt at attacking European ships, there was none about plundering Asiatic merchants, where great booty was to be gained with little risk. Sometimes the Governors were in league with the pirates, who paid them to wink at their doings. Those who were more honest had insufficient power to check the evil practices that were leniently, if not favourably, regarded by the colonial community, while their time was fully occupied in combating the factious opposition of the colonial legislatures, and in protective measures against the French and Indians. The English Government, absorbed in the French war, had no ships in the Indian seas; but the straits to which English trade in the East had been reduced, and the enormous losses caused by the pirates, at last forced some measures to be adopted for coping with the evil that had assumed such gigantic proportions. [1] It appears likely that this was the John Steel mentioned by Drury as his uncle in Bengal. There is very little doubt that much of Drury's alleged slavery in Madagascar was spent among the pirates. [2] It would appear that he assumed the name of Every on taking to piracy. [3] Sir James Houblon was an Alderman of London, and a Governor of the Bank of England at the time. [4] The letter appears to have been left by Every with the natives of Johanna, who gave it to the merchant captains who brought it to Bombay. [5] The quotation is taken from Johnson's History of the Pirates. In his |
|