"If I am rightly informed, there are some of the Company's officers of
a very low character. One of them was formerly a trumpeter at a raree
show in this country, and when he was discharged that honourable
service he listed himself in the Company's service as a common soldier,
and I suppose was made an officer by one of those governors for
trumpeting to him better than any other man could do it in the country.
Another, I am told, was a low sort of barber--one of our
shave-for-a-penny barbers--here in London. And another of
them was a butcher here, and when he is not upon duty I am
told he still exercises his trade there. Can we think that such
officers will not be despised by gentlemen who have the honour to
bear his Majesty's commission?"

He based his opposition to the bill on the unfitness of the Company's
officers to exercise authority, and to the bad relations sure to arise
between them and the King's officers.[7]

In quarters they were not allowed to give any orders to their men, or to
have any control over them, the most trivial matters being kept in the
hands of the merchants and factors. To such an extent was this carried,
that for fifty years afterwards no military officer was allowed to give
out the parole and countersign.[8] Their only duties were to command the
men when under arms. Commissions were granted and taken away by the
Council without reference to the Directors.

Under such treatment there could be neither self-respect nor pride in
their profession. Of their general behaviour, we may gather some idea
from an entry concerning Lieutenant Parker at this time. He was arraigned
before the Council for drinking, brawling with his men, and frequenting