Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 153, November 14, 1917 by Various
page 40 of 52 (76%)
page 40 of 52 (76%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
extraordinarily plausible if not convincing.
* * * * * To begin with, experts in anagrams will not fail to notice that the names ALGERNON SWINBURNE and W. ROBERTSON NICOLL contain practically the same number of letters--absolutely the same if SWINBURNE is spelt without an "e"--and that the forenames of both end in "-on," as does also the concluding syllable of WATTS-DUNTON. The fact that the Editor of _The British Weekly_ has never published any poems over his own name only tends to confirm the theory, as the argument conclusively establishes. * * * * * For it is impossible to believe that so versatile a polymath should not at some time or other have courted the Muse, and if so, under what name could he have had a stronger motive for publishing his poems than that of SWINBURNE? So austere a theologian would naturally shrink from revealing his excursions into the realms of poesy, and under this disguise he was safe from detection. Lastly, while Sir W. ROBERTSON NICOLL has always championed the Kailyard School, SWINBURNE lived at The Pines. The connection is obvious; as thus: Kail, sea-kale, sea-coal, coke, coker-nut, walnut, dessert, pine-apple, pine. * * * * * As regards SWINBURNE'S conduct of _The British Weekly_, it is enough to point to such alliterative and melodious combinations as "Rambling Remarks" and "Claudius Clear." The theological attitude of the paper |
|