Further Foolishness by Stephen Leacock
page 11 of 238 (04%)
page 11 of 238 (04%)
|
that--thin as gruel. Nothing else will "sit on his
stomach." Everything must come to the present-day reader in this form. If you wish to talk to him about religion, you must dress it up as a story and label it _Beth-sheba_, or _The Curse of David_; if you want to improve the reader's morals, you must write him a little thing in dialogue called _Mrs. Potiphar Dines Out_. If you wish to expostulate with him about drink, you must do so through a narrative called _Red Rum_--short enough and easy enough for him to read it, without overstraining his mind, while he drinks cocktails. But whatever the story is about it has got to deal--in order to be read by the average reader--with A MAN and A WOMAN, I put these words in capitals to indicate that they have got to stick out of the story with the crudity of a drawing done by a child with a burnt stick. In other words, the story has got to be snoopopathic. This is a word derived from the Greek--"snoopo"--or if there never was a Greek verb snoopo, at least there ought to have been one--and it means just what it seems to mean. Nine out of ten short stories written in America are snoopopathic. In snoopopathic literature, in order to get its full effect, the writer generally introduces his characters simply as "the man" and "the woman." He hates to admit that they have no names. He opens out with them something |
|