Notes and Queries, Number 11, January 12, 1850 by Various
page 42 of 62 (67%)
page 42 of 62 (67%)
|
that he preferred the Don Quixote with the defects to the Don Quixote
without them. Having answered one query, I presume I may be permitted to propose one, in which I feel much interested. Is the recently published BUSCAPIÉ the work of Cervantes? We have now been favoured with two translations, one by Thomasina Ross, the other by a member of the University of Cambridge, under the title of _The Squib, or Searchfoot_; the latter I have read with some attention, but not having been able to procure the Spanish original, I should be glad to have the opinion of some competent Spanish scholar who has read it, as to its genuineness. My own impression is that it will prove an ingenious (perhaps innocent?) imposture. The story of its discovery in a collection of books sold by auction at Cadiz, and its publication _there_ by Don Adolfo de Castro, in the first place, rather excites suspicion. My impression, however, is formed from the evident artificial structure of the whole. Still, not having seen the original, I confess myself an imperfect judge, and hope that this may meet the eye of one competent to decide. S.W. SINGER * * * * * ANCIENT ALMS-BASINS. I have read the various notices in Nos. 3, 5, and 6. on the subject of these dishes. I have an electrotype copy from such a dish, the original of which is in Manchester. The device is like No. 4. of those of |
|