Gentle Measures in the Management and Training of the Young - Or, the Principles on Which a Firm Parental Authority May Be - Established and Maintained, Without Violence or Anger, and the Right - Development of the Moral and Mental Capacities Be Promoted by Jacob Abbott
page 55 of 304 (18%)
page 55 of 304 (18%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
manner in which it is designed to act in repressing offenses. This is
necessary in order that the punitive measures which he may employ may accomplish the desired good, and avoid the evils which so often follow in their train. _Nature and Design of Punishment_. The first question which is to be considered in determining upon the principles to be adopted and the course to be pursued with children in respect to punishment, is, which of the two views in respect to the nature and design of punishment which prevail in the minds of men we will adopt in shaping our system. For, 1. Punishment may be considered in the light of a vindictive retribution for sin--a penalty demanded by the eternal principles of justice as the natural and proper sequel and complement of the past act of transgression, with or without regard to any salutary effects that may result from it in respect to future acts. Or, 2. It may be considered as a remedial measure, adopted solely with reference to its influence as a means of deterring the subject of it, or others, from transgression in time to come. According to the first view, punishment is a _penalty_ which _justice_ demands as a satisfaction for the past. According to the other it is a _remedy_ which _goodness_ devises for the benefit of the future. Theologians have lost themselves in endless speculations on the question how far, in the government of God, punishment is to be considered as possessing one or the other of these two characters, or both combined. |
|