A Short History of Women's Rights - From the Days of Augustus to the Present Time. with Special Reference - to England and the United States. Second Edition Revised, With - Additions. by Eugene A. Hecker
page 45 of 307 (14%)
page 45 of 307 (14%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
to Servianus: Gaudeo et gratulor, quod Fusco Salinatori filiam tuam
destinasti. Note the way in which Julius Caesar arranged a match for his daughter--Suetonius, _Divus Julius_, 21. [34] Paulus in Dig., 23, 2, 2: Nuptiae consistere non possunt, nisi consentiunt omnes, id est, qui coeunt quorumque in potestate sunt. [35] Julianus in Dig., 23, 1, 11. [36] Ulpian in Dig., 23, 1, 12. [37] Paulus in Dig., 23, 1, 13. Terentius Clemens in Dig., 23, 2, 21. [38] Paulus, ii, 19, 2. [39] Ulpian, 24, 17. [40] Cf. Ulpian, Tit., vi, 6: Divortio facto, si quidem sui juris sit muller, ipsa habet rei uxoriae actionem, id est, dotis repetitionem; quodsi in potestate patris sit, pater adiuncta filiae persona habet actionem. The technical recognition of the father's power was still strong. Cf. Pliny, _Panegyricus_, 38: Tu quidem, Caesar ... intuitus, opinor, vim legemque naturae, quae semper in dicione parentum esse liberos iussit. The same writer, on requesting Trajan to give citizenship to the children of a certain freedman, is careful to add the specification that they are to remain in their father's power--see Pliny to Trajan, xi (vi). |
|