Experimental Determination of the Velocity of Light - Made at the U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis by Albert A. Michelson
page 51 of 58 (87%)
page 51 of 58 (87%)
|
objection, in another form, is that the image is more or less indistinct.
This is answered by a glance at the tables. These show that in each individual observation the average error was only three ten-thousandths of the whole deflection. Uncertainty of Laws of Reflection and Refraction in Media in Rapid Rotation. What is probably hinted at under the above heading is that there may be a possibility that the rapid rotation of the mirror throws the reflected pencil in the direction of rotation. Granting that this is the case, an inspection of Fig. 14 shows that the deflection will not be affected. In this figure let _m m_ be the position of the mirror when the light first falls on it from the slit at _a_, and _mâ² mâ²_ the position when the light returns. [Illustration: FIG. 14.] From the axis _o_ draw _op op_, perpendicular to _m m_ and to _mâ² mâ²_, respectively. Then, supposing there is no such effect, the course of the axis of the pencil of light would be _a o c_ mirror _c o aâ²_. That is, the angle of deflection would be _a o aâ²_, double the angle _p o pâ²_. If now the mirror be supposed to carry the pencil with it, let _o câ²_ be the direction of the pencil on leaving the mirror _m m_; i.e., the motion of the mirror has changed the direction of the reflected ray through the angle _c o câ²_. The course would then be _a o c_, mirror _câ² o_. From _o_ |
|