Essay on the Trial By Jury by Lysander Spooner
page 63 of 350 (18%)
page 63 of 350 (18%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
before they settled in England.
[18] Beneficium was the legal name of an estate held by a feudal tenure. See Spelman's Glossary. [19]] Contenement of a freeman was the means of living in the condition of a freeman. [20] Waynage was a villein's plough-tackle and carts. [21] Tomlin says, "The ancient practice was, when any such fine was imposed, to inquire by a jury quantum inde regi dare valeat per annum, salva sustentatione sua et uxoris et libe- rorum suorum, (how much is he able to give to the king per annum, saving his own maintenance, and that of his wife and children). And since the disuse of such inquest, it is never usual to assess a larger fine than a man is able to pay, without touching the implements of his livelihood; but to inflict corporal punishment, or a limited imprisonment, instead of such a fine as might amount to imprisonment for life. And this is the reason why fines in the king's courts are frequently denominated ransoms, because the penalty must otherwise fall upon a man's person, unless it be redeemed or ransomed by a pecuniary fine." Tomlin's Law Dict., word Fine. [22] Because juries were to fix the sentence, it must not be supposed that the king was obliged to carry the sentence into execution; but only that he could not go beyond the sentence. He might pardon, or he might acquit on grounds of law, not withstanding the sentence; but he could not punish beyond the |
|


