The Principles of Masonic Law - A Treatise on the Constitutional Laws, Usages and Landmarks of - Freemasonry by Albert G. Mackey
page 99 of 272 (36%)
page 99 of 272 (36%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
The reading of the minutes of the evening, not for confirmation, but for
suggestion, lest anything may have been omitted, should always precede the closing ceremonies, unless, from the lateness of the hour, it be dispensed with by the members. Section II. _Of Appeals from the Decision of the Chair._ Freemasonry differs from all other institutions, in permitting no appeal to the lodge from the decision of the presiding officer. The Master is supreme in his lodge, so far as the lodge is concerned. He is amenable for his conduct, in the government of the lodge, not to its members, but to the Grand Lodge alone. In deciding points of order as well as graver matters, no appeal can be taken from that decision to the lodge. If an appeal were proposed, it would be his duty, for the preservation of discipline, to refuse to put the question. It is, in fact, wrong that the Master should even by courtesy permit such an appeal to be taken; because, as the Committee of Correspondence of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee have wisely remarked, by the admission of such appeals by _courtesy_, "is established ultimately a precedent from which will be claimed _the right to take_ appeals."[52] If a member is aggrieved with the conduct or the decisions of the Master, he has his redress by an appeal to the Grand Lodge, which will of course see that the Master does not rule his lodge "in an unjust or arbitrary manner." But such a thing as an appeal from the Master to the lodge is unknown in Masonry. |
|