Faraday as a Discoverer by John Tyndall
page 89 of 138 (64%)
page 89 of 138 (64%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
The law of action in relation to this point is, that in diamagnetic crystals, the line along which the repulsion is a maximum, sets equatorially in the magnetic field; while in magnetic crystals the line along which the attraction is a maximum sets from pole to pole. Faraday had said that the magne-crystallic force was neither attraction nor repulsion. Thus far he was right. It was neither taken singly, but it was both. By the combination of the doctrine of diamagnetic polarity with these differential attractions and repulsions, and by paying due regard to the character of the magnetic field, every fact brought to light in the domain of magne-crystallic action received complete explanation. The most perplexing of those facts were shown to result from the action of mechanical couples, which the proved polarity both of magnetism and diamagnetism brought into play. Indeed the thoroughness with which the experiments of Faraday were thus explained, is the most striking possible demonstration of the marvellous precision with which they were executed. Footnotes to Chapter 11 [1] See Heat as a Mode of Motion, ninth edition, p. 75. [2] See Sir Wm. Thomson on Magne-crystallic Action. Phil. Mag., 1851. Chapter 12. Magnetism of flame and gases--atmospheric magnetism |
|