Civilization and Beyond - Learning from History by Scott Nearing
page 46 of 324 (14%)
page 46 of 324 (14%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
was less surplus for experiment and innovation as more
and more of the social income was devoted to meeting overhead costs. Moralists have insisted that the decline and dissolution of Roman civilization resulted from the abandonment of moral standards. Undoubtedly this was true. The upstanding womanhood and manhood of early Rome was replaced by a wealth-seeking, pleasure-loving, parasitically inclined population. But these features of Roman life under the empire and during the period of Roman decline were the outcome of political, economic and social forces that have characterized one civilization after another. Instead of insisting that Rome declined and fell because it was immoral, it would be far more accurate to insist that Rome declined and fell because the objectives which it sought, the means it employed and the civilized institutions which it developed contained within themselves oppositions and contradictions which led to decline and dissolution. Rome declined and fell because the ideas, institutions and practices upon which it depended--the ideas, institutions and practices of civilization--could lead to no other outcome. CHAPTER THREE THE ORIGINS OF WESTERN CIVILIZATIONS An experiment with civilization presently spans the planet Earth. It is called "modern," "contemporary" or "western civilization." Its |
|