Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 99, October 18, 1890 by Various
page 18 of 40 (45%)
page 18 of 40 (45%)
|
odd, Volumes. What are their rules? Do they go "odd man out" to decide
who shall pay for the banquet? Must they dine in the daytime, because, being an odd lot, they cannot sit down to dinner at eventide? A list of the Odd members is given in the little book; but who cares what, or who, the Odds are, as long as they each and all are happy? 'Tis a pity that, in this _multum in parvo_ of a book, the author should have spoken disparagingly of "Glorious JOHN." It would be worth while to refer to MACAULAY's _Dramatists of the Restoration_, and to compare the licence of that age with that of SHAKSPEARE's time, when a Virgin Queen, and not a Merry Monarch, was on the throne. And, when we come to SHERIDAN's time, how about _The Duenna_, and _The Trip to Scarborough_, which was supposed to be an improvement on the original? However, _puris pura puerisque puellis_, as my excellent friend, Miss MAXIMA DE BETUR observes. But one ought not to look a gift pony in the mouth any more than one ought to critically examine a jest which is passed off in good company. The jest was not meant to be criticised, and the pony wasn't given you in order that you might critically express an opinion on its age. If a pony--a very quiet, steady grey pony--were presented as a mark of affection and esteem to the Baron, he most certainly would _not_ inspect its mouth, seeing that he would not be a tooth the wiser for the operation; but, if the Baron had a friendly vet. or a hipposcientist at hand, he would certainly ask _him_ to examine the gift cob before the Baron either drove or rode him. _Quo tendimus? In Latium?_ Verily, for the next work at hand is Mr. HUTTON's _Monograph on Cardinal Newman_, which, of all the writings about his Eminence that I've lately read, I can (says the Baron, in one of his more severely sedate moods,) most confidently recommend to |
|