Write It Right - A Little Blacklist of Literary Faults by Ambrose Bierce
page 58 of 59 (98%)
page 58 of 59 (98%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
although, unlike which and who, they require nothing but knowledge of
grammar. _Widow Woman_. Omit woman. _Will_ and _Shall_. Proficiency in the use of these apparently troublesome words must be sought in text-books on grammar and rhetoric, where the subject will be found treated with a more particular attention, and at greater length, than is possible in a book of the character of this. Briefly and generally, in the first person, a mere intention is indicated by shall, as, I shall go; whereas will denotes some degree of compliance or determination, as, I will go--as if my going had been requested or forbidden. In the second and the third person, will merely forecasts, as, You (or he) will go; but shall implies something of promise, permission or compulsion by the speaker, as, You (or he) shall go. Another and less obvious compulsion--that of circumstance--speaks in shall, as sometimes used with good effect: In Germany you shall not turn over a chip without uncovering a philosopher. The sentence is barely more than indicative, shall being almost, but not quite, equivalent to can. _Win out_. Like its antithesis, "lose out," this reasonless phrase is of sport, "sporty." _Win_ for _Won_. "I went to the race and win ten dollars." This atrocious solecism seems to be unknown outside the world of sport, where may it ever remain. _Without_ for _Unless_. "I cannot go without I recover." Peasantese. |
|