Book-bot.com - read famous books online for free

Indian Nullification of the Unconstitutional Laws of Massachusetts Relative to the Marshpee Tribe - Or, the Pretended Riot Explained by William Apes
page 71 of 185 (38%)
gives a right to petition, if the House can refuse to hear the
petition. They do not ask for action, but to be heard. It can
be read and laid on the table. So long as I hold a seat in
this House, my hand shall be raised to give a hearing to the
humblest individual who presents a petition for redress of
grievances.

Mr. Loring of Hingham hoped the idea could not be entertained
that they wished to throw this subject out of the House. He
wanted the whole subject should be brought up, and not that
this petition should go in first. It was not his wish to
prevent the petitioners being heard.

The Speaker put the question, shall the petition be read? and
it was carried in the affirmative, nearly every hand in the
House being raised. In the negative we saw but five hands. The
petition was then read by the Speaker.

Mr. Roberts of Salem moved that it be laid on the table and
printed for the use of the House, as there must be a future
action of the House upon it. The motion was carried without
objection.

The attempt to prevent the petition of the Marshpee Indians
from being read, was repelled in the House with an unanimity
which shows the value the Representatives place upon the right
of petitioning. The poor Indians are without advice or counsel
to aid them, for they have no means to fee lawyers, but they
will evidently find firm friends in the House ready to do them
justice. This is no party question. It involves the honor of
DigitalOcean Referral Badge