The Case for India by Annie Wood Besant
page 57 of 62 (91%)
page 57 of 62 (91%)
|
in India is not only a political, but also an economic and
industrial, problem. Whereas in Europe the cultural impulse has travelled from the city to the village, in India the reverse has been the case. The centre of social life in this country is the village, and not the town. Ours was essentially the cottage industry, and our artisans still work in their own huts, more or less out of touch with the commercial world. Throughout the world the tendency has been of late to lay considerable emphasis on distributive and industrial co-operation based on a system of village industries and enterprise. Herein would be found the origins of the arts and crafts guilds and the Garden Cities, the idea underlying all these being to inaugurate a reign of Socialism and Co-operation, eradicating the entirely unequal distribution of wealth amongst producers and consumers. India has always been a country of small tenantry, and has thereby escaped many of the evils the western Nations have experienced owing to the concentration of wealth in a few hands. The communistic sense in our midst, and the fundamental tenets of our family life, have checked such concentration of capital. This has been the cause for the non-development of factory industries on a large scale. The need for these changes--to which England is returning, after full experience of the miseries of life in manufacturing towns--is pressing. Addressing an English audience, G.K. Gokhale summed up the general state of India as follows: Your average annual income has been estimated at about £42 per head. Ours, according to official estimates, is about £2 per |
|