Notes and Queries, Number 38, July 20, 1850 by Various
page 53 of 67 (79%)
page 53 of 67 (79%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
explanation of the origin of the bands now worn by the clergy; which,
however, seems merely to amount to their being an adoption of a Genevan portion of clerical costume. That they are the descendants of the ruff, there can be no doubt, just as wrist-bands have more recently succeeded to ruffles. I cannot resist mentioning that an ingenious friend suggested to me, that the broad, stiff, laid-down collar, alluded to in the former part of Arun's communication, possibly gave rise to the modern band in the following manner:--When the scarf, still in use, was drawn over the shoulders and hung down in front, that part of the broad collar which was left visible, being divided up the middle, presented a shape and appearance exactly like our common bands. Hence, it was imagined, this small separate article of dress might have originated. Is it Butler, Swift, or who, that says, "A Chrysostom to smoothe his band in"? Whenever this was written, it must have referred to our modern bands. Who amongst the clergy are _entitled_ to wear a scarf? Is it the badge of a chaplain only? or what circumstances justify its being worn? Alfred Gatty. July 1. 1850. _Bands_ (Vol. ii., p. 76.).--An early example of the collar, approaching to the form of our modern bands, may be seen in the portrait of Cardinal |
|