Q. E. D., or New Light on the Doctrine of Creation by George McCready Price
page 71 of 117 (60%)
page 71 of 117 (60%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
manifest or latent in the ancestry. Changes in the environment during
the embryonic stage, it is true, seem sometimes to be registered in the growing form; but it has never yet been proved that these induced changes can ever amount to a unit character or genetic factor that will maintain itself and segregate as a distinct factor after hybridization. Ancestry alone furnishes the material for the factor, and no amount of induced change can get itself registered in the organism so as to come into this charmed circle of ancestral characters which alone seem to be passed on to posterity. A quotation from Bateson ought to set this point at rest: "The essence of the Mendelian principle is very easily expressed. It is, first, that in great measure the properties of organisms are due to the presence of distinct, detachable elements [factors], separately transmitted in heredity; and secondly, that _the parent cannot pass on to offspring an element, and consequently the corresponding property, which it does not itself possess_."[28] [Footnote 28: _Scientific American_ Sup., January 3, 1914.] Heredity we now see is a method of analysis, and the facts brought to light by Mendelism help us very much toward an understanding of living matter. Especially does it help us to understand the complexity underlying the facts of heredity, which until now have seemed so strange and capricious. As Professor Punnett of Cambridge remarks: "Constitutional differences of a radical nature may be concealed beneath an apparent identity of external form. Purple sweet peas from the same pod, indistinguishable in appearance and of identical ancestry, may yet |
|