this intention, as well as the addition of some fuller references to the
writers quoted, which had been omitted, and the point, to my infinite
regret, was overlooked. The whole of the authorities in note 3,
therefore, do not support the apparent statement of martyrdom in
Antioch, although they all confirm the date, for which I really referred
to them. With this explanation, and marking the omitted references
[89:1] by placing them within brackets, I proceed to analyse the two
notes in contrast with Dr. Westcott's statements.

NOTE 3, FOR THE DATE A.D. 115-116.

DR. WESTCOTT'S STATEMENTS. | THE TRUTH.
|
| Baur, _Urspr. d. Episc., Tüb.
| Zeitschr._ 1838, H.3 (p. 149,
| Anm.) Baur states as the date of
| the Parthian war, and of Trajan's
| visit to Rome, "during which the
| above order" (the sentence against
| Ignatius) is said to have been
| given, A.D. 115 and not 107.
|
"1. Baur, _Urspr. d. Episc., Tüb. | _Ibid._ p. 155, Anm.
Zeitschr._ 1838, ii. 3. p. 155, |
Anm. In this note, which is too | After showing the extreme
long to quote, _there is nothing_, | improbability of the circumstances
so far as I see, _in any way | under which the letters to the
bearing_ upon the history [90:1] | Smyrnaeans and to Polycarp are said
except a passing supposition 'wenn | to have been written, Baur points
... Ignatius im J. 116 an ihn | out the additional difficulty in