Studies in the Psychology of Sex, Volume 1 - The Evolution of Modesty; The Phenomena of Sexual Periodicity; Auto-Erotism by Havelock Ellis
page 53 of 511 (10%)
page 53 of 511 (10%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
In Rome, "when there was at first much less freedom in this
matter than in Greece, the bath became common to both sexes, and though each had its basin and hot room apart, they could see each other, meet, speak, form intrigues, arrange meetings, and multiply adulteries. At first, the baths were so dark that men and women could wash side by side, without recognizing each other except by the voice; but soon the light of day was allowed to enter from every side. 'In the bath of Scipio,' said Seneca, 'there were narrow ventholes, rather than windows, hardly admitting enough light to outrage modesty; but nowadays, baths are called caves if they do not receive the sun's rays through large windows.' ... Hadrian severely prohibited this mingling of men and women, and ordained separate lavaera for the sexes. Marcus Aurelius and Alexander Severus renewed this edict, but in the interval, Heliogabalus had authorized the sexes to meet in the baths." (Dufour, _Histoire de la Prostitution_, vol. ii, Ch. XVIII; cf. Smith's _Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities_, Art. BalneƦ.) In Rome, according to ancient custom, actors were compelled to wear drawers (_subligaculum_) on the stage, in order to safeguard the modesty of Roman matrons. Respectable women, it seems, also always wore some sort of _subligaculum_, even sometimes when bathing. The name was also applied to a leathern girdle laced behind, which they were occasionally made to wear as a girdle of chastity. (Dufour, op. cit., vol. ii, p. 150.) Greek women also wore a cloth round the loins when taking the bath, as did the men who bathed there; and a woman is represented bathing and wearing a sort of thin combinations reaching to the middle of the thigh. (Smith's _Dictionary_, loc. cit.) At a later period, St. |
|