Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science - Volume 17, No. 099, March, 1876 by Various
page 56 of 277 (20%)
page 56 of 277 (20%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
on some important business negotiation connected with Bombay or the
west of India; for they are Bhattias, who are also followers of the most singular religion the world has ever known--that of the Vallàbháchárya or Maharaja sect. These are Epicureans who have quite exceeded, as well in their formal creeds as in their actual practices, the wildest dreams of any of those mortals who have endeavored to make a religion of luxury. They are called Vallàbhácháryas, from _Vallabha_, the name of their founder, who dates from 1479, and _áchárya_, a "leader." Their _Pushti Marga_, or eat-and-drink doctrine, is briefly this: In the centre of heaven (_Gouloka_) sits Krishna, of the complexion of a dark cloud, clad in yellow, covered with unspeakable jewels, holding a flute. He is accompanied by Roaha, his wife, and also by three hundred millions of Gopis, or female attendants, each of whom has her own palace and three millions of private maids and waiting-women. It appears that once upon a time two over-loving Gopis quarreled about the god, and, as might be expected in a place so given over to love, they fell from heaven as a consequence. Animated by love for them, Krishna descended from heaven, incarnated himself in the form of Vallabha (founder of the sect), and finally redeemed them. Vallabha's descendants are therefore all gods, and reverence is paid them as such, the number of them being now sixty or seventy. To God belong all things--_Tan_ (the body), _Man_ (the mind) and _Dhan_ (earthly possessions). The Vallàbhácháryas therefore give up all first to be enjoyed by their god, together with his descendants (the Maharajas, as they royally term themselves) and his representatives, the gosains or priestly teachers. Apply these doctrines logically, and what a carnival of the senses results! A few years ago one Karsandas Mulji, a man of talent and education, was sued for libel in the court at Bombay by this sect, whose practices he had been exposing. On the trial the evidence revealed such a mass |
|