Notes and Queries, Number 27, May 4, 1850 by Various
page 64 of 92 (69%)
page 64 of 92 (69%)
|
times, and the substitution during the protectorate of the registration
of births which might or might not be communicated to the elected parish register, for that of baptisms which the parish priest would both celebrate and register, the names of very many of those born into the world would be altogether omitted from these records. It may be interesting to show the effects of some of these causes by the subjoined extracts from the registers themselves, which I transcribe from the _Chronicon Mirabile_ of the late Sir Cuthbert Sharpe.--(Vide pp. 17. 18. 22. 23. 70. 121. and 156.) _Staindrop, Durham._--"1644. From this time to 1646, through want of a Minister, and carelessness of ye Cleark, during ye wars, much of ye Register is lost, only here and there a name registered." "1652. June 14. Mem. From this time till August there was noe Minister, soe that ye children were carried to other parishes to be baptized." _St. Helen's Aukland, Durham_, A.D. 1633.--"Mr. John Vaux, our minister, was suspended.... Mr. Robert Cowper, of Durham, served in his place, and left out divers christenings unrecorded, and regestered others disorderly." _Gainford, Durham._--"Courteous Reader, this is to let thee understand that many children were left unrecorded or redgestered, but the reason and cause was this; some would and some would not, being of a fickle condition, as the time was then; this being their end and aim, to save a groate from the poor Clarke, so they would rather have them unredgestered--but |
|