Manual of Ship Subsidies by Edwin M. Bacon
page 98 of 134 (73%)
page 98 of 134 (73%)
|
contracts were in operation. Up to 1898 no lines had been established on
the Pacific under the law. In the judgment of the subsidy advocates the law's failure to produce the anticipated results only proved its inadequacy in not providing enough subsidy. Accordingly, further measures were proposed affording a more generous supply. In December, 1898, Senator Mark Hanna, of Ohio, brought forward a bill providing liberal navigation and speed bounties to all American vessels engaged in the foreign trade. This measure, as defined by its title, proposed "to promote the commerce and increase the foreign trade of the United States, and to promote auxiliary cruisers, transports, and seamen for Government use when necessary." The subsidy was again termed "compensation." It was to be payable on gross tonnage for mileage sailed both outward and homeward bound, according to speed. The rate to steamships showing on trial test a speed above fourteen knots was to increase proportionately; sailing-ships and steamers of less trial speed than fourteen knots, were to receive the lowest rate. This was fixed at one dollar and fifteen cents per gross ton for each hundred of the first fifteen hundred miles sailed both outward and homeward bound, and one cent per gross ton for each hundred miles over one hundred miles both ways. The additional speed bounties ranged from one cent per gross ton for steamers of 1,500 tons and speeding fourteen knots, to 3.2 cents for those over 10,000 tons and showing twenty-three knots. The act was to be in force for a term of twenty years, and no contracts were to be made under it after ten years. The Hanna bill met strong opposition, and was finally dropped. A substitute measure, drawn by Senator Frye, of Maine, took its place. |
|