Conception Control and Its Effects on the Individual and the Nation by Florence E. Barrett
page 10 of 31 (32%)
page 10 of 31 (32%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
There are, however, serious fallacies in these contentions.
The propagandists of conception control appear to take it for granted that after preventive measures in early youth, children may be conceived at will whenever they are desired; and, moreover, it is assumed that apart from such precautions every woman will conceive annually and will continue to do so until 10-12 children have been born. Neither of these suppositions is supported by facts. On the contrary, there are large numbers of married couples who would give anything to have children, but have postponed it until circumstances should seem quite desirable, and then, to their grief, no children are given to them. It is very unfair to teach people that they may safely postpone the natural tendency to bear children in youth and rely upon having them later in life. Probably gynæcologists are consulted more often by women who desire children but do not have them, than by those who wish to avoid having them--the truth being that the tendency among people in comfortable surroundings is towards relative sterility rather than towards excessive fertility. Those who are interested in this aspect of the question will find the facts admirably set forth in Mr. Pell's book on _The Law of Births and Deaths_, being a study of the variation in the degree of animal fertility under the influence of environment. He finds that the all-important factor which determines fertility is the amount of nervous energy of the organism, and that nervous energy is produced or modified by three specially influential factors, viz., Food, both quantity and quality; Climate, hot or cold--moist or dry; |
|