Notes and Queries, Number 24, April 13, 1850 by Various
page 16 of 71 (22%)
page 16 of 71 (22%)
|
Kilkenny.
* * * * * MAYORS.--WHAT IS THEIR CORRECT PREFIX? I wish to ask, of any of your numerous readers, what may be considered the most proper official prefix for Mayors, whether Right Worshipful or Worshipful? Opinions, I find, differ upon the subject. In the _Secretary's Guide_, 5th ed. p. 95. it is said that Mayors are Right Worshipful; the late Mr. Beltz, _Lancaster Herald_, was of opinion that they were Worshipful only; and Mr. Dod, the author of a work on Precedence, &c., in answer to an inquiry on the point, thought that Mayors of _cities_ were Right Worshipful, and those of _towns_ were only Worshipful. With due deference, however, I am rather inclined to think that all Mayors, whether of cities, or of towns, ought properly to be styled "the _Right_ Worshipful" for the following reason:--all Magistrates are Worshipful, I believe, although not always in these days so designated, and a mayor being the chief magistrate ought to have the distinctive "_Right_" appended to his style. And this view of the subject derives some support from the fact of a difference being made with regard to the Aldermen of London (who are all of them magistrates), those who have passed the chair being distinguished as the Right Worshipful, whilst those below the chair are styled the worshipful only; thus showing that the circumstance of being Mayor is considered worthy of an especial distinction. Probably it may be said that custom is the proper guide in a case like this, but I believe that there is no particular custom in some towns, both prefixes being sometimes used, and more frequently none at all. It seems desirable, however, that some rule should be laid down, if possible, by common |
|