Inferences from Haunted Houses and Haunted Men by John William Harris
page 38 of 45 (84%)
page 38 of 45 (84%)
|
By such experience, too, the monotonous reading can be explained; it was the commencement by less powerful hypnotists of a supporting attack: the words would become audible, distinguishable, and noticeable later. This might ensue after the victim was more deeply hypnotised. Probably the very words which were to be used later were used then, a sort of sub-conscious memory being created. Apparitions of a misty nature are described by Podmore in his chapter on "Haunted Houses."[33] Miss Langton saw a misty phantom, and _Lizzie_ the housemaid saw a cloud and afterwards got a cramp, less persistent than the butler's, as she began to scream.[34] The upper housemaid saw a woman whose legs she did not notice,[35] as was the case with Mr. Godfrey's friend to whom he appeared hypnotically. [Footnote 33: "Studies," pp. 315, 326.] [Footnote 34: "Haunting of B---- House," p. 167.] [Footnote 35: _Ibid_., pp. 205, 207.] The fact that the dog that appeared to Miss Freer was a spaniel like Major S.'s, shows familiarity with the house on the part of the gang. That they moved about early near the house is shown by Mr. C. hearing the caw of the rooks at 5.35 on March 6; they would not start cawing so early unless disturbed. There is thus abundant evidence (1) that rascals were at work; (2) accounting for certain of the phenomena observed; (3) pointing out their resemblance to cases of experimental hallucinations or |
|