The Duty of Disobedience to the Fugitive Slave Act - Anti-Slavery Tracts No. 9, An Appeal To The Legislators Of Massachusetts by Lydia Maria Francis Child
page 28 of 46 (60%)
page 28 of 46 (60%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
the State, for the political welfare of our own people, for the
moral character of our posterity. For, as sure as there is a Righteous Ruler in the heavens, if you continue to be accomplices in violence and fraud, God will _not_ "save the Commonwealth of Massachusetts." L. MARIA CHILD. APPEAL TO THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT. The Hon. Robert Rantoul, Hon. Horace Mann, Hon. Charles Sumner, and other able men, have argued against the Constitutionality of the Fugitive Slave Bill, proving it to be not only contrary to the _spirit_ and _meaning_ of the Constitution, but also to be unauthorized by the _letter_ of that document. That this nefarious Bill is contrary to the _spirit_ and _intention_ of the Constitution is shown by the published opinions of those who framed it; by the debates at the time of its adoption; and by its Preamble, which sets forth that it was ordained to "establish _justice_, ensure domestic _tranquillity_, promote the _general welfare_, and secure the blessings of _liberty_." The arguments adduced to prove that this bill is unauthorized by the _letter_ of the Constitution, I will endeavor to compress into a few words. Article 10 of the Amendments to the Constitution expressly provides that |
|