An English Grammar by J. W. (James Witt) Sewell;W. M. (William Malone) Baskervill
page 124 of 559 (22%)
page 124 of 559 (22%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
[Sidenote: _Relative omitted when_ object.] 129. The relative is frequently omitted in spoken and in literary English when it would be the object of a preposition or a verb. Hardly a writer can be found who does not leave out relatives in this way when they can be readily supplied in the mind of the reader. Thus,-- These are the sounds we feed upon.--FLETCHER. I visited many other apartments, but shall not trouble my reader with all the curiosities I observed.--SWIFT. Exercise. Put in the relatives _who_, _which_, or _that_ where they are omitted from the following sentences, and see whether the sentences are any smoother or clearer:-- 1. The insect I am now describing lived three years,--GOLDSMITH. 2. They will go to Sunday schools through storms their brothers are afraid of.--HOLMES. 3. He opened the volume he first took from the shelf.--G. ELIOT. 4. He could give the coals in that queer coal scuttle we read of to his poor neighbor.--THACKERAY. |
|