An English Grammar by J. W. (James Witt) Sewell;W. M. (William Malone) Baskervill
page 161 of 559 (28%)
page 161 of 559 (28%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
Remarks on Irregular Adjectives. [Sidenote: _List I._] 164. (1) The word good has no comparative or superlative, but takes the place of a positive to _better_ and _best_. There was an old comparative _bet_, which has gone out of use; as in the sentence (14th century), "Ich singe _bet_ than thu dest" (I sing better than thou dost). The superlative I form was _betst_, which has softened to the modern _best_. (2) In Old English, evil was the positive to _worse_, _worst_; but later _bad_ and _ill_ were borrowed from the Norse, and used as positives to the same comparative and superlative. _Worser_ was once used, a double comparative; as in Shakespeare,-- O, throw away the _worser_ part of it.--HAMLET. (3) Little is used as positive to _less_, _least_, though from a different root. A double comparative, _lesser_, is often used; as,-- We have it in a much _lesser_ degree.--MATTHEW ARNOLD. Thrust the _lesser_ half by main force into the fists of Ho-ti. --LAMB. (4) The words much and many now express quantity; but in former times _much_ was used in the sense of _large_, _great_, and was the |
|