An English Grammar by J. W. (James Witt) Sewell;W. M. (William Malone) Baskervill
page 71 of 559 (12%)
page 71 of 559 (12%)
|
[Sidenote: _Its advantages: Euphony_.]
(1) When a word is modified by _a_, _the_, _this_, _that_, _every_, _no_, _any_, _each_, etc., and at the same time by a possessive noun, it is distasteful to place the possessive before the modified noun, and it would also alter the meaning: we place it after the modified noun with _of_. [Sidenote: _Emphasis._] (2) It is more emphatic than the simple possessive, especially when used with _this_ or _that_, for it brings out the modified word in strong relief. [Sidenote: _Clearness._] (3) It prevents ambiguity. For example, in such a sentence as, "This introduction _of Atterbury's_ has all these advantages" (Dr. Blair), the statement clearly means only one thing,--the introduction which Atterbury made. If, however, we use the phrase _of Atterbury_, the sentence _might_ be understood as just explained, or it might mean this act of introducing Atterbury. (See also Sec. 87.) The following are some instances of double possessives:-- This Hall _of Tinville's_ is dark, ill-lighted except where she stands.--CARLYLE. Those lectures _of Lowell's_ had a great influence with me, and I used to like whatever they bade me like.--HOWELLS |
|