An English Grammar by J. W. (James Witt) Sewell;W. M. (William Malone) Baskervill
page 8 of 559 (01%)
page 8 of 559 (01%)
|
These are sufficient to suggest several distinct notions about English grammar-- [Sidenote: _Synopsis of the above._] (1) It makes rules to tell us how to use words. (2) It is a record of usage which we ought to follow. (3) It is concerned with the _forms_ of the language. (4) English _has_ no grammar in the sense of forms, or inflections, but takes account merely of the nature and the uses of words in sentences. [Sidenote: _The older idea and its origin._] Fierce discussions have raged over these opinions, and numerous works have been written to uphold the theories. The first of them remained popular for a very long time. It originated from the etymology of the word _grammar_ (Greek _gramma_, writing, a letter), and from an effort to build up a treatise on English grammar by using classical grammar as a model. Perhaps a combination of (1) and (3) has been still more popular, though there has been vastly more classification than there are forms. [Sidenote: _The opposite view_.] |
|