Punch, Or The London Charivari, Volume 102, January 16, 1892 by Various
page 10 of 39 (25%)
page 10 of 39 (25%)
![]() | ![]() |
|
_Ans._ That I had neglected my duty.
_Ques._ Were you to question a Witness on his past, and, by an interruption of the trial, that Witness's evidence were consequently to become superfluous, what would then be said of you? _Ans._ That I had exceeded my duty. _Ques._ Is it an easy matter to reconcile the interests of your clients with the requirements of Public Opinion. _Ans._ It is a most difficult arrangement, the more especially as Public Opinion is usually composed of the joint ideas of hundreds of people who know as much about law as does a bed-post. _Ques._ In the eyes of Public Opinion, whose commendation is the most questionable? _Ans._ The commendation of a Judge, because it stands to reason (according to popular ideas) that a man who knows his subject thoroughly must be unable to come to any definite decision as to its merits. _Ques._ And in the eyes of the same authority, whose commendation is the most valuable? _Ans._ In the eyes of Public Opinion the most valuable commendation would come from a man who is absolutely ignorant of everything connected with a Counsel's practice, but who can amply supply this possible deficiency by writing a letter to the papers and signing |
|